Class Eleven: Wednesday, April 15, 2009



 
Class Eleven Topics


Review Assignments from Class Ten

For the last assignment, you were asked to eithe:

1. use any program of your choosing to attempt to add captions to a video clip. In my exploration on captioning, Camtasia Studio worked well, however it would be good to investigate how other options work for adding captions to video clips. If you choose this option, you will need to add captions to a video clip that includes at least 30 seconds of recorded narration. 

If you select this option, please u
pload your completed video to a location online where I can view it (such as Google Video, YouTube, Blogger, or other location) and include the URL in your post.  

or

2. write about adding captions to a video project. If you select this option, you should address some or all of the following topics:

When you have completed this assignment, go to the course discussion blog at: http://cuin7346.blogspot.com/ and under Discussion Assignment Ten, post a comment in which you discuss your work on this assignment.

http://shaunna-cuin7346.blogspot.com/

I used Camtasia to add captions to a new portion of my video project. I got frustrated trying to manipulate the various parameters to make it fit within my personal aesthetics, so I just gave in to the default settings and called it a day. Creating the captions was very easy and did not require much time at all. I saved the completed file as an AVI and uploaded it to my video blog, where you can view it.

 
http://video-lrschmidt.blogspot.com/

While most of the digital stories on the website could in some ways be helped by adding captions (except for one which relied almost entirely on visuals and was interesting in that regard), I was particularly drawn to the Engines of our Ingenuity stories. As I listen to Dr. Leinhard on NPR regularly and even once attended a book signing to pick up a copy of his latest book for my father, a now-retired engineer who graduated from the University of Houston in the early 1970s, I was already intrigued by the way in which Leinhard could connect knowledge from so many disciplines to, in fact, describe how things work.

I saw the Macbeth clip and thought back to my year as an English teacher. (I taught English briefly for one year as part of an alternative certification program before deciding to pursue my master’s degree in education.) One of the last pieces of literature I taught was that of Macbeth. My students (all seniors) were less than thrilled to begin another piece of literature that they had difficulty reading, particularly when they were within weeks of graduating from high school. Still, the power of the story itself was enough to draw many of them in, provided that we discussed in detail what was happening and connected the material to real-world events. My students began to research tragic heroes of the world, ranging from Che Guevara to Idi Amin to Princess Diana and compare their stories to those of Macbeth, while learning to paraphrase direct quotes from Shakespeare so that the power of his words weren’t lost in translation.

I could imagine using Leinhard’s Macbeth video in a class such as this. To be honest, many of my students were reading on a level below that of twelfth grade English, some at perhaps a fourth or fifth grade level. It was like pulling teeth at times to teach sonnets (required by my particular school) to English language learners who could not understand why the words were so mixed up in iambic pentameter. One student said that it took her nearly six hours to paraphrase a single sonnet. She may have been exaggerating, but she and many others struggled mightily with the language. Still, simply having the words to a narration, particularly of someone connecting a personal story and experience to Macbeth or any other work of literature, helped tremendously.

In literacy courses, professors emphasize repeating words in as many modes as possible. With my SAT preparation class, we would routinely act out “vocabulary charades,” make up songs and pneumonic devices, and post drawings of our words around the room. While some students (such as the children my sisters-in-law teach who cannot hear without cochlear implants) absolutely need captions, even those who are first learning to read, who are still learning to speak and write in English, or who struggle with functional literacy even as high school seniors can benefit from having printed words accompany a voiceover on an educational video.

If I had the opportunity to do that year over again, I would have made many changes to my teaching style, and one important change would have been to include more educationally significant videos with captions (instead of merely showing the movie at the end of the unit as worn-out teachers are apt to do) and assign a video project in place of a final paper (which would have made me quite a popular teacher as the kids were sick of writing by the end of the year).

Though my students might not have been able to read Shakespeare as fluently as I would have liked, they certainly were able to understand the concepts of Shakespeare and to think at a high level. Captions would have reinforced the ideas expressed in the video in addition to the direct quotes from Shakespeare and would have helped them to remember the higher level language connected with the ideas.

 
http://viking.coe.uh.edu/~gkitmacher/ISSTrial1.wmv

I was able to use my previously created video with narration and then added captions. 

Using Sony Vegas, captions are quite easy. The most difficult part was that, like with Photoshop or Imageready, Vegas works in layers with several video layers available and my captions did not show up until I figured out they needed to be on the top layer in order to overlay the video images. Once I figured it out, its a simple drag and drop to position the captions higher in the sequence. 

Captions are easy to create, modify and position, and you can even use effects such as rotating. (I have not yet figured out how to scroll.) 

The more I use the Vegas program, the easier it appears to be to use and the more comfortable I am with it. And unlike Premiere, it always works.

 
Hi, y’all. The lesson on captioning presents aesthetic and technological challenges. In the class demonstration the added captions appeared in paragraph-like stacks of sentences, and looking at Shaunna’s project I see similar results. When viewing the video I stopped looking at the captions and focused on the image being presented. These old eyes tend to avoid small print except when absolutely necessary. I wonder if running captions, being less static and maybe in a larger font, would hold my attention. Probably not. I am a lazy person and the narrator (in this case, Shaunna) is doing a fine job informing me without the effort of reading. 

I like to watch movies from other countries and deal with the subtitles well. Usually subtitles are in large print and easier to read, but even then I always feel like I am missing the subtleties of the imagery and acting because I am too busy reading. Subtitles at the opera are convenient because they are simple and can be understood at a glance and then I return to focusing on what’s on stage and the singing—the often drawn out or repetitious style of singing gives me time to get back to what’s important after glancing at the subtitles. So for me subtitles at the opera actually add to rather than distract from the experience.

I looked at several of the art entries posted at Educational uses of Digital Storytelling website. First I watched Journey into Process and thought “no captions necessary.” It is mostly music and images that speak for themselves. There isn’t narration so I don’t think captions would be a positive addition. A hearing impaired viewer would not need captions to understand this narrative. 

Then I clicked on Van Gogh’s Letters to Theo. I think the video is mislabeled. It was about a man named Kenny. Mostly it was old photos and letters with music and narration—a very personal story about a woman’s uncle killed in the war. Though captions could be added I don’t think it would improve or add to the experience of watching this digital narrative. The handwritten letters were clearly readable and the images of the Purple Heart, Bronze Star, letter informing the family, casket, and memorial wall did not need words at all—even for the hearing impaired. 

Next I watched two of the narratives about James Surls. Captions could work well with them. There was a lot of information given by the narrator that a hearing impaired viewer would not get otherwise, and most of the images are presented in a way that would allow for captioning at the bottom without interference or conflict. 

The entry on Christo and Jean-Claude’s installations would be a tough order for captioning. The still shots were labeled at the bottom so captioning would interfere with what’s already there. However, without captioning, a person with impaired hearing would miss most of the information presented. 

The volume of the narration and music is very low in the digital narrative about pinhole cameras that is posted on the site, so I turned the controls up all the way on my laptop to make it audible. The narrator’s information would be lost on the hearing impaired, but the graphics presented filled the screen so captioning would have to be placed over details and markings in the graphics—making them cluttered or difficult to read. 

So out of the ones I watched, the Surls stories are the best candidates for captioning. 

For a while I was working on copying a DVD with one of Akira Kurosawa’s films on it. Subtitles in English had been added to the DVD—and I noticed other languages were available when I was copying it—but I recorded the movie without captioning. Since I have seen this particular movie several times I already knew the dialog—or at least the English translation of the dialog—and enjoyed seeing Kurosawa’s “pure” work for the first time without the subtitles. Do they distract from his work? Yes. Are they necessary? Yes, unless the viewer knows Japanese it would be impossible to understand Kurosawa’s intentions. Cut and dried opinion is that captioning is, in many cases, a necessary distraction. 

Captioning is not just to assist the hearing impaired. It can be a way to reach across cultures. I have a closed captioning setting on my television that I sometimes use. If I could watch some of my favorite movies or television shows with English dialog and Spanish subtitles I think I could learn the Spanish language quicker than from structured dialog in prepared lessons. I don’t hear other languages well. Seeing them in print helps. It would be interesting and maybe helpful to individual learning styles to watch different languages captioned over videos recorded in English. 

Captioning in videos seen in environments such as bars or public places allow video/film/sports/news to be enjoyed even though there is a lot of background noise. Classrooms seldom get as loud as a bar but there are sometimes a lot of distractions—especially for students that have trouble concentrating. Captioning also allows for watching video without disturbing others in environments where quiet is the protocol. Last month was in a waiting room at Methodist Hospital and still was able to watch the news. 

If captioning is used it should be fitted to the particulars of the video. If it runs at the bottom it should not distract from or overlay important images or labels. If it is for translation it should be accurate. It should complement the viewing experience so plans need to be made a priori for adequate space at the bottom of frames.
 
 
I had a hard time choosing a video that it would be helpful to have captions with. I don't really feel that any videos need captions unless it is for a viewer that is hearing impaired or is in another language. But then that would go for all of the videos and not just a single one. The only video (and I feel that this is a stretch) that I would say could really use captions would be the one about Puerto Rico and that is only because it is difficult to hear and understand the narrator over the music. I think that videos that are in universal topics could benefit from having captions that are in different languages. However, being ADD myself and a multi-tasker I would be more distracted by the words and would therefore pay attention less to the video itself. I have a hard time watching subtitled videos because I concentrate too much on the words and miss important parts of the visual aspect of the video. Obviously captioning can be beneficial for those that speak a different language if the captioning is done in their language and for those that are hearing impaired. While thinking about ways that I could use captions in my classroom, however, I thought back to when sing-a-long videos were popular. I remember learning the songs to popular (my favorite!) Disney songs by watching these sing-a-long videos. I think that would be a really neat way to use captioning by putting text with educational music videos (such as the color and alphabet songs that my students sing in class). I would be curious to know if there is a way to highlight the text as the words are sung as was done in the sing-a-long videos that I remember.
 
Hi everyone,
I found a really great captioning device in YouTube. It is now offered as a recent addition to their services. Here is the link to their tutorial. I think I did it properly, however, at this time, the captions have not shown up yet. Until they show up, I plan to keep at it.

It seems to work! You may have to turn on closed captions to see it. Here's the video's link
 
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-5814243770404272110

I'm using iMovie, which does not appear to have a caption option. I'm simply adding titles and timing them as best I can. I tried using Adobe Encore to add captions, but the program is far beyond my capabilities without watching hours of tutorials.
 


 


Web-Based Video Editors

Several Web-based applications have appeared in the last few years that let users assemble and edit videos online without the need for a separate video editing program. Although none of the current crop of online tools approaches the level of sophistication or feature set of the stand-alone video editing programs, they are all free tools that may serve as a useful starting point for teachers interested in experimenting with digital video editing and sharing over the Web.

These online resources are also important in that they provide us with a glimpse of where video editing technology may be headed in the not too distant future. Because they are web-based, they are able to change quickly and keep up with the new developments in video technology that are certain to come.

Photobucket
http://photobucket.com 
Wikipedia entry: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photobucket

JayCut 
http://jaycut.com/

is definitely not appropriate for K-12 audiences. Users must be 18 or older or 13 with parental consent. Appears to be based in Sweden and subject to Swedish law which is considerably different than in USA.

JumpCut 

http://www.jumpcut.com/

apparently bought by Yahoo and no longer allows videos to be uploaded.
See:
http://www.downloadsquad.com/2008/12/17/yahoo-cuts-back-online-video-editing-service-jumpcut/

One True Media
http://www.onetruemedia.com/

includes advertising and contains a few questionable videos.

GoAnimate
http://goanimate.com/go/movie/0Fd1pwGPGipg/1

Movie Masher
http://www.moviemasher.com

 


Assignments for Next Class


Reading Assignment


Class Eleven Assignment

For this week's assignment, You should explore at least one of the online video editing sites listed above, or a similar resource of your own choosing. The goal is to explore the site and its capabilities to see if it is useful for educators and/or students. 

When you have completed your review, go to the course discussion blog at: http://cuin7346.blogspot.com/ and under Discussion Assignment Eleven, post a comment in which you discuss the online tool you evaluated and include specific details about what the site offers and whether you feel it would be helpful to educators and students or not.